Jackson, Philip W. (1998). John Dewey and the Lessons of
Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pp. xvi + 204
$30 (Cloth) ISBN 0-300-07213-9
$15 (Paper) ISBN 0-300-08289-4
Reviewed by Tracie E. Costantino
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
August 6, 2001
The title of Philip Jackson's book, John Dewey and the
Lessons of Art, holds promise in the current climate of
increased advocacy efforts by arts educators for a more
secure place for the arts in the core curriculum. It begs
the questions, what are the lessons of art according
to Dewey, a cherished educational theorist for arts
educators, who are the lessons for, and how might these
lessons be applied? The answers to these questions are both
familiar and surprising, but Jackson makes the reader wait
until the end of the book before he addresses the question I
was most interested in, how might these lessons be applied
to education? The focus of this review will be on how well
Jackson answers this question.
Jackson clearly states the purpose of his book and its
intended audience in the opening lines of the introduction:
This book deals with what the arts have to teach us about
how to live our lives
It also treats the subsidiary
question of how teachers of all kinds might make use of
art's 'lessons' (understood in experiential terms) to
improve their teaching. (p. xi)
Hence, it would seem that the book is targeted primarily to a
general audience and secondarily to educators, (Note 1) but
later in the introduction Jackson specifies that he is
interested in addressing teachers and professional educators
in particular, due to his longstanding interest in
teaching as a professional practice and as a human
endeavor (p. xii). This nicely parallels Dewey's
theory of art as an essential part of human experience, and
foreshadows the link Jackson intends to explore between
aesthetic experience and education.
He further explains the objectives of his book, citing
two goalspresenting an overview of Dewey's
thinking about the arts and saying something about its
practical implications for the general reader and especially
for educators (p. xiii). Despite my hopes for a more
practical discussion of Dewey's conceptions of the lessons
of art and their application to education, as implied in the
book's title and the introduction's opening statement, this
later statement in the introduction reveals the more musing
style of Jackson's writing and his modest intentions to
say something as opposed to inspire action.
Although his main focus on how Dewey's theory of the
transformative power of art can modify irrevocably our
habitual ways of thinking, feeling, and perceiving (p.
xiv), does not seem modest at all, his intention is first to
present Dewey's theory and then to muse over its relevance
for contemporary life and education. By the book's end, it
becomes apparent that the responsibility is on the reader to
decide how art's lessons might be applied concretely.
Jackson's intentions are enacted through the four main
themes of the book, which correspond to its four chapters:
experience and the arts (chapter one), the spirituality of
art-centered experiences (chapter two), experience as
artifice: putting Dewey's theory to work (chapter three),
and some educational implications of Dewey's theory of
experience (chapter four). The first chapter delivers on
Jackson's promise to present an overview of Dewey's
thinking about the arts as it is a careful explication
of Dewey's philosophy of experience, focusing on art-
centered aesthetic experience as opposed to what Jackson
calls naturally occurring aesthetic experiences (those based
on watching a sunset, for example, or children playing in a
park). The second chapter explores the transformative
quality of an experience centered on artthe
sense of spirituality that has long been associated with
artistic experiencesbut here Jackson tests that notion
against twentieth-century art. How is spirituality
manifested in art created in a post-Nietzschean world?
It is in chapters one and two that Jackson identifies the
lessons of art according to Dewey: a call for the kind of
perceiving that requires patience and careful attending and
that results in deeper meanings. According to Jackson,
perception is more than looking or recognition; it is a way
to make sense of what one senses, to partake of its
meaning (p. 57). Dewey emphasizes, What
is perceived are meanings, rather than just events or
circumstances (Jackson, 1998, p. 57). Through this
heightened perception, common, daily events or experiences
can be transformed into meaningful aesthetic experiences
that have a strong impact on the perceiver, often changing
the way he or she feels or thinks about something for the
rest of his or her life. Jackson closes chapter one with
perhaps the book's most inspiring and direct statement of
art's lessons for life and education.
Our failure to partake of life's richness, to enjoy its
qualitative immediacy, leaves us divorced from the here and
now, vainly directing our thoughts and aspirations toward an
imagined future that never arrives. That condition, Dewey
would say, is to be avoided at all costs. Works of art help
to instruct us in the how and the why of avoiding it. (p.
67)
Dewey considers the most powerfully transformative aesthetic
experiences to occur during the perception of a work of art,
an aesthetic experience, the work of art in its
actuality, is perception (Jackson, 1998, p.
57). Jackson carries Dewey's idea further in a provocative
statement almost fifty pages later in the book, Could
it be, in short, that even extraordinary experiences must be
made into art if they are to become transformative for those
who undergo them? (p. 104) He effectively illustrates
this idea in his discussion of Elizabeth Bishop's poem
The Fish, implying that it is through the poetic
expression of an extraordinary fishing experience that the
poetess had a transformative experience. Unfortunately,
instead of elaborating on this idea further, which has great
potential for an understanding of the essential role of art
in human experience and, therefore, education, Jackson
spends the third chapter presenting an application of
Dewey's valuing of perception to three books that seem
tangential to the discussion, as none of them specifically
reference Dewey.
The books are in the self-help genre and despite their lack
of a direct reference to Dewey, Jackson believes that they
are Deweyan in spirit and offer concrete applications of his
philosophy of experience. The first, Wherever You Go,
There You Are by Kabat-Zinn (1994), focuses on personal
improvement through meditation and the other two,
Learning by Heart by Kent and Steward (1992) and
Franck's (1973) Zen of Seeing focus on personal
improvement through drawing and art making. All are grounded
in exercises for increased perception as the means toward
greater life fulfillment. Granted, Jackson is trying to
illustrate how Dewey's theories can be applied even to books
that are not directly informed by his philosophy, thereby
demonstrating the broad applicability of his theory of
experience. The more simplistic treatment of perception in
these works (as explained by Jackson) (Note 2), however,
undermines the potency of Jackson's own statement about the
role of art in transformative experience, as well as the
importance Dewey gives to art as the embodiment of
perception, and hence, meaning. Although Jackson's selection
of these books does permit him to introduce the reader to a
lesser known aspect of Dewey's lifehis study with F.
Matthias Alexander, creator of the self-help Alexander
Techniquethese pages may have been better spent on a
more significant connection to other important theories
about the application of aesthetic experience to daily
living and education, such as the emphasis on attending by
Maxine Greene (Greene, 1995) or Harry Broudy's concept of
enlightened cherishing (Broudy, 1972). I recognize that
Jackson aims to address a more general audience with these
self-help books, but a reference instead to Greene and or
Broudy could both have popular appeal and satisfy the reader
interested in education.
Jackson's methodical explication of Dewey's philosophy of
experience in chapter one and then the extensive discussion
of the transformative power of art-centered aesthetic
experience in chapter two created for me an eager
anticipation of the application of these theories to more
meaningful life and educational experiences. Chapter three's
discussion of the self-help books diminishes the central
role of art carefully constructed in the previous two
chapters. In chapter four, Jackson does not address my most
pressing question, how might the lessons of art be applied
to education, until the last page and a half of the book.
Instead, he presents a dichotomized view of the current
practice of teaching as divided into two camps,
child-centered and subject-centered, and places this view within
the historical context of Dewey's own struggle over his
advice of learning by doing and how to balance
that with subject expertise. Jackson then uses Dewey as a
case example of a teacher who does not use the lessons of
artperception and attendingin his practice.
Based on the impressions of three former students of Dewey,
Jackson describes Dewey's lecturing style as
meandering without purpose from one remark to
another (p. 184) and as having a disregard for his
students' presence in the audience, implying that Dewey was
not paying attention to his students' needs or perceiving
the impact of his teaching on them. But what these attentive
students eventually realized was that Dewey was not
meandering without purpose but engaged in the
process of creative thinking instead. As Jackson explains,
Dewey was
showing them what it was like to do philosophy,
what it meant to be a philosopher. In his bumbling and
fumbling manner he was offering his students a living
instantiation of the principle that lay at the core of his
own educational perspective. He was, of all things,
learning by doing
His was not a performance that
had been rehearsed the day before.
This was the philosopher-in-action. (p. 189)
The self-absorption of Dewey's lecturing style resembles
that of the artist or philosopher-in-action. It
is as if, according to Jackson, Dewey's teaching depicted
the balance between learning by doing and subject expertise.
In essence, Dewey was providing his students with an
experience. Yet this is retold through the words of
three students who may or may not be representative of
Dewey's students in general. Is this a lesson in the
importance of attending, meaning that these students were
perceptive enough to be transformed through the experience
of Dewey's philosopher-in-action teaching style?
Jackson does not make this point explicit, declaring instead
that he still considers Dewey a somewhat ineffectual
teacher, wondering why he didn't pay more attention to his
students or why he failed to apply the standards
nurtured in him by the arts (p. 194). Despite the
intentions outlined in the opening statement of his
introduction, by using Dewey as a negative case example and
concluding the book with this puzzlement, Jackson leaves the
reader still unclear as to how to apply Dewey's rich and
persuasive theory of art-centered aesthetic experience to
the practice of teaching.
Notes
-
Jackson also immediately sets the reader at ease on the
first page of the introduction by assuring that a prior
familiarity with Dewey's writings is not necessary.
-
For example, Kent and Steward (1992) recommend spending
fifteen minutes every day observing the shadows in the
corner of a room and writing down everything one sees.
While this may be an effective exercise for improving our
habits of observation, how does it translate into the
meaningful quality Dewey attributes to perception?
References
Broudy, H. (1972). Enlightened cherishing. Urbana,
IL: University of Illinois Press.
Franck, F. (1973). The Zen of seeing. New York:
Vintage Books.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on
education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you
are. New York: Hyperion.
Kent, C. & Steward, J. (1992). Learning by heart. New
York: Bantam Books.
About the Reviewer
Tracie E. Costantino is a doctoral student in Aesthetic
Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
She is especially interested in studying how students
personally relate to works of art in all media, i.e., the
nature of their aesthetic experience, and how the aesthetic
philosophies of John Dewey, Harry Broudy, and Maxine Greene
might be translated into classroom practice.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment