Dahlström Lars (Ed.). (2000). Namibian Educators
Research Their Own Practice: Critical Practitioner Inquiry
in Namibia. Windhoek, Namibia: Gamsberg Macmillan.
153 pp.
$8 ISBN 99916-0-256-8
Reviewed by Christine Capacci Carneal
Florida State University
July 6, 2001
This collection of essays, written by teachers,
principles, and teacher educators, is an excellent example
of the benefits gained from merging ivory towers and
practitioner inquiry. Instead of scholars passing down
knowledge, the practitioners in this book are creating it
on their own by accessing and reflecting on academic
literature and their personal experiences. It is a book
about people involved in education and the daily life of a
classroom practicing what they preach through the use of
practitioner inquiry and action
research to improve their teaching techniques, get
messages across, and ameliorate the educational
environment. Indeed, it is reflection of the new
philosophy of education in Namibia as stated on the
first page of the introductory chapter.
The book is divided into three sections covering themes
dealing with basic education, pre-service teacher
education, and in-service teacher advising. The
discussions surrounding basic education topics cover the
use of storytelling in the classroom to integrate cross-
curricular themes; how participatory development of class
rules can contribute to improved discipline among students;
motor skill problems; and how community-school relations
can be improved to contribute to attendance rates and
interest in the subject matter. The pre-service teacher
education section examines how teachers can improve their
feedback and support of teacher trainees; how to increase
student interest and abilities in certain subjects such as
arts and crafts, English, and Namibian languages; how to
integrate curricular themes; and how to increase female
participation in the classroom. The final chapter
introduced peer coaching to in-service teacher
advisors.
Practitioner inquiry in this book revolves around action
research. The educators are changing their practices
through self-assessment of their own classroom experiences
contributing to a process of continual construction of
educational knowledge for themselves. The whole
compilation is filled with examples of how creative
collaborative (most often with the students themselves) can
lead to change and improving the learning environment.
Each essay tells of how one leader (the teacher, principle
or teacher educator) took the initiative to use
participatory research and student input to improve
learning processes in the classroom.
One such case is Zacharias Ekandjo's, a secondary school
teacher, attempt to motivate learning through
community-based activities. The impetus behind his inquiry was to
better understand why some Grade 10 students habitually
arrived late for their Business Management class. He began
by questioning the learners themselves and discovered that
it was due to the boring subject nature of the class, a
lack of discipline by the teacher, or low interest in
school on the learners' part. Rather than write these
grievances off as the students' problem, he decided to
alter his teaching methods to see if it helped to change
the situation. This is when he decided to develop a
community-based activity to get the students to become
agents in their own learning process based on a belief that
providing them with this opportunity would engage them more
and result in more enthusiasm for the subject matter. The
students were instructed to do some market research
involving interviews and data collection on competitive
products. The information gathered was discussed and
analyzed in class orally. This variation in classroom
activities led Mr. Ekandjo to witness more interest and
understanding of the subject, Business Management, as well
as a reduction in absentee rates. He states that finding
an activity that piques curiosity and increasing
interactions between the school and the community, and the
students themselves were key to these results. In
addition, it led to an improvement in communication and
inquiry skills and students' confidence during
presentations rose.
Of course, the above example does not present never-explored
ideas. The themes surrounding the above
activities, learner-centered approaches, linking community
and schools, etc. are commonly known and accepted practices
within the educational context. But, what the chapter does
do is provide the inspiration and motivation to go out and
do something similar in one's own classroom, which is not
as often a practice among the preachers. It displays
scholarly and practitioner knowledge by applying the theory
to practice in the name of creative and participatory
research. There are no sentences that begin with
teachers ought to
in this book; rather it
presents a description of how it can be done through the
eyes of practitioners.
In
addition to applying the basic tenets of participatory
action research, there is often careful consideration of
the environment in which the educators are working. Louise
and George Spindler would be proud of these Namibian
educators as they take into account culture and cultural
practices when discussion classroom activities. All of the
essay writers use participant observation as their initial
research method and approach their research as a problem-
solving device. There is a large effort to equalize power
relations between the teachers and students in the
strategies and in the analysis of problems in the
classrooms. The practitioner inquirers show a creative use
of resources on hand and working groups in the classroom
are the norm.
The
teachers, principle and teacher educators who wrote these
essays are obviously academically trained and have had
training in participatory research designs. For the most
part, they follow a standard approach for writing up
research. First they begin with a literature review based
on the perceived problem and then analyze the literature as
it applies to the problem. Research questions are then
formulated based on school context and the literature
review. Then a description of research methods or proposed
action research follows and each chapter ends with a
presentation of the results, data analysis, and a
discussion of lessons learned and other reflections. There
is often a personal note about how the use of action
research helped the teacher to improve their classroom
activities. As one author says, through action
research I have learned not only how to identify a problem,
but also to plan activities relevant to my findings in
order to remedy the focal problem, reflect on the whole
process, and write up a relevant report (p. 95). Or
more personally, they will discuss how action research has
contributed to their own improved observation skills,
an improved ability to work independently, and an improved
capacity to help my students according to their learning
needs (p. 95).
The specific nature of the discussion in the essays could
also be one of the drawbacks to the collection. As
Dahlström points
out, this book is written by Namibians for
Namibians (p. 2).
The educational context, openness and willingness to create
a fresh Namibian philosophy of education, may not exist in
other contexts. Certainly, the level of academic training
received by the educators in this book is not the norm for
most teachers in sub-Saharan Africa, especially those at
the primary school level. This is a presentation of
results that can potentially occur when one has the time,
resources, and will to train teachers. It sheds no light
on how to fill classrooms with qualified teachers in the
midst of educational crises. Most sub-Saharan African
Ministries of Education are trying to figure out how to
deal with issues such as replacing the trained teachers who
have died from the AIDS epidemic of late, or how best to
teach classrooms of 70 students or more. The time and
reflective nature put into creating a situation that
results in essays of this nature should be the norm, but in
most cases it is a luxury.
Yet, there is no arguing that using teachers as researchers
in their own classroom is not an effective and almost
panacea-like solution to ridding the traditional frontal
teaching methods so common in post-colonial schools in sub-
Saharan Africa. The book demonstrates how teachers can be
an active part of monitoring and evaluation, how they can
take on self-assessment activities, particularly in an
environment where teacher support is limited, such as in
many rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa. It achieves the
above through demonstration, rather than discussion. For
this reason, the book seems more like a guide to building
your own car engine than a traditional academic resource.
In other words, it may prove to be more useful for
stimulating action and achieving results. It is not a
candy-coated display of these actions either. The authors
of the various essays also discuss their difficulties as
teachers and researchers creating an empathetic
presentation of their actions and justification for them.
Their philosophical beliefs and leanings are laid out as
part of their rationale for selecting certain methods and
approaches. They discuss their biases based on their
practical experiences. It is a very positive and
optimistic read about how education practitioners recognize
a problem that exists in their teaching methods or class
learning processes and does not ignore it but cares enough
to go out and improve upon the situation. These are
success stories drawn from perceptive and caring
individuals.
While I would not recommend reading the book in one
sittingfor then it feels more like an exercise
similar to reading papers for an action research class at
the end of a semesterit is a handy book to have
nearby for both academics and practitioners. The essays
are well written and clear in their goals, despite the
repetitive nature of the design and content of each
chapter. The literature reviews are particularly useful in
their quick, not-too-academic, presentation of the issues
at hand.
Another useful characteristic of the chapters includes a
highlighted box listing keywords for the essay
underneath the title of the chapter and the author's name.
This box lets the reader know ahead of time the subject or
subjects discussed in the literature review and some of the
strategies applied in the action research described within
the essay. For example, in the chapter entitled
Writing Problems in Oshiwambo, the keywords
listed are: accuracy; collaborative writing; Namibian
languages; peer tutoring; teacher education; writing
process (p. 81). This section offers a quick overview for
the reader to assess how the chapter contents may shed
light on different action research strategies and their
application and to look for similar themes of concern
relative to the reader's classroom.
Though a summary chapter might help to pull together major
themes, this book is certainly helpful for both education
practitioners and students. For those already in the
education profession, it becomes a continual reminder to
practice what you preach. It will make you
excited to employ action research in your own classroom, as
the essays are enthusiastic and the results successful.
For students or future education leaders, it will instill a
healthy inquisitive mind as head of a classroom or school.
Students will become practice-oriented if they follow the
guidance of teachers in this book. The major lesson of the
book is that "doing is believing." This book definitely
reinforces the position that local practitioners are the
ones who have the knowledge to creatively solve problems
through reflective and active participation in their
community.
About the Reviewer
Christine Capacci Carneal is a doctoral candidate at
Florida State University. The title of her dissertation is
Community Schools as Alternative Educational
Development Strategies: How do Stakeholders Feel About
Their Success in the Case of Save the Children's Project in
Mali?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment