Fernando Reimers (Ed.).(2000). Unequal Schools, Unequal
Chances: The Challenges to Equal
Opportunity in the Americas. Cambridge, MA:
David Rockefeller Center, Harvard University Press.
xv + 464 pp.
$24.95 (paper) ISBN 0-674-00375-6.
Reviewed by James J. Harrington
Boston College
August 29, 2001
A provocative and
immensely helpful book, Unequal Schools is also a
handbook
for participatory practices in fostering social and economic
growth in both developing and seemingly developed nations.
It is
a volume that can be used in undergraduate courses in Latin
American history, government, or economics, and a work that
could
be definitive in graduate education courses.
During the past two
decades issues of equity and development have dominated the
discussion of education in Latin America. Organizations
including the World Bank, the InterAmerican Development
Bank,
UNESCO, and numerous NGOs have examined ways in which to
move
underdeveloped and less developed countries into the global
economy. After many years and many words, we are still
seeking
answers.
In Unequal
Schools,
Unequal Chances, Fernando Reimers has added another
project
to his agenda of participatory solutions to third world
problems:
here the issue of equity and equal opportunity that
education can
offer to social and economic development. Reimers offers
both a
highly original vision and a continuation of the important
research agendas begun in the late 1950s and early 60s by
Noel
McGinn, et al at the Harvard GSOE. Their work had often led
to
frustrations over the failure of policy to connect and
follow the
research trail provided in studies across the world [Latin
America, Pakistan, Egypt, among others]. A major success in
the
post-war period in El Salvador is based upon an education
system
assessment that Reimers led in partnership with the Ministry
of
Education and the USAID. Earlier work proved a similar
point in
research to develop education policy in Egypt. This book
provides answers, and many more questions for
study.
This edited volume
includes carefully selected, quantitatively based research
from
across the Americas. The tables, charts, and graphing are
valuable as quantitative descriptions of places and topics
not
commonly available to students or scholars. Enrollment
figures
are generally available in Latin America, although they do
not
always accurately describe what they purport to describe.
Here
these standard data are coupled with measures of inequality
and
other social, economic, and academic data. International
tests,
measures and analytic descriptors of spending, as well as
comparative social indicators explain and enhance the work
here,
informing student and academic alike. These combine with
often
compelling photos of students and locations to underline the
message of the text.
Reimers himself
describes the theoretical premises and the limits faced by
the
authors. He is apologetic for being so involved personally
in an
edited volume: he writes three of the introductory chapters
and
the conclusion. However, it would be hard for Reimers to
step
aside in a work that is the most recent culmination of his
twenty-year research agenda. His chapters explain the
theoretical and practical framework of the work, setting the
intellectual and social topography. As a result, the book
though
edited, has a precise, coherent objective and message: there
are
in the Americas deep inequalities in educational opportunity
and
attainment for children of different social backgrounds.
There
is an equally strong belief that research and policy can
solve
these problems. Reimers emphasizes that an examination of
the
opportunities of the poor can assist the role of policy in
expanding those chances, and those policy
matters.
In two well-written
and
interesting chapters he explains the why and what prescribed
by
educational opportunity in this hemisphere. Reimers knows
the
interconnection of education, poverty and inequality in the
Americas, and he defines these elements in their paradoxical
relationship: "In the presence of growing levels of
educational
opportunity and attainment ... [there are] growing levels of
income inequality and very severe, persistent poverty" (page
5).
This paradox is the research driven knowledge that
development
requires an educated population, at least workforce, yet the
reality that most of these societies preserve structure that
screen people out of the educational system.
Unequal
Schoolsdescribes a basic conflict
between educational success and failure often created by the
social and economic context of the student. The research
shows
that poverty leads to lowered opportunity in Argentina,
Chile,
Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and the United States. These
countries
represent 474 million people and 61% of the population of
the
Americas. As befits a participatory philosophy, Reimers
includes
multiple perspectives on each country/region, mixing local
and
outside views of the area and topics. Reimers is recognized
as a
leader in international education. He has also become
expert in
the theory that underlies the participatory premise of this
book
[and much of his recent work, most notably Informed
Dialogue with Noel McGinn (1997)].
While policy may
not
represent reality, particularly in describing what happens
to
poor children in school, policy has often been successful in
improving the conditions and schools that these children
attend.
The authors of _Unequal Schools_ continually report on the
encouraging ability of policy to make positive gains. What
these
authors agree on is a desire to increase the amount of
success
and to move it into the equity domain. What they suggest is
that
we "examine the learning opportunities of the children of
the
poor and the role of education policy in expanding those
choices" (page 7).
The authors'
propose a
daunting task at the outset: "...to present a current
account of
the state of educational opportunity for low income groups
in the
Americas. The goal is to offer various frameworks to
conceptualize the dynamics of educational inequality at the
micro
level and to discuss, based on empirical evidence, the
short- and
long-range impact of various policy efforts aimed at
expanding
the learning chances of the children of the poor" (page
9).
The opening section
of
the book includes chapters by Charles Willie and Donald
Winkler,
in addition to Reimers. Both of these scholars are old
hands in
the equity discussion. Willie describes foundational
concepts of
educational equity based upon a quantitative study in South
Carolina [USA]. Willie's emphasis on raising the levels by
raising all boats - not the water - is based upon his
observation
that too many have drowned by the rising tide in the
traditional
approach. It is Willie's view that improving the lot of
those at
bottom should be used to push those above to new levels.
Winkler, a scholar of Latin America and education for many
years,
discusses the framework for classifying approaches for
improving
the education of poor children and schools. With Reimers,
Willie
and Winkler define the theoretical landscape. They ask
fundamental questions that are often ignored. Among these
is the
issue of desegregation. In response
to chapter one,
Carlos
Munoz Izquierdo asks, "how are we to desegregate education
in a
society that remains economically and socially separated and
unequal? Clearly, race and economic class extend their
impact
across the world.
The choice of
Argentina
as the first locale was based on its position among the
first
nations committed to universal education. The evidence from
Argentina underlines the inherent paradox in the book's
theme.
The pervasiveness of the problem in Argentina states its
power,
continuing to exist in a state convinced and committed to
its
solution. Yet it also shows the possibility of expanding
opportunity through policy choices. Argentina has
successes, not
just continuing problems.
Two chapters on
Chile
show the possibilities of linking educational goals and
public
policy. In a nation with a proud education history,
Garcia-Huidabro and the Scheifelbeins' debate the policies
of the
1990s, examining the goals, claims, and evidence. A single
chapter on Colombia describes a similar premise linking
policy
success with educational goals. Yet here too the evidence
underlines the pervasiveness of the equity problems,
illustrating
what Reimers had earlier described as "policies that address
inequality, with a major redistributive purpose, could make
education an equalizing force in social opportunity." (Page
56)
Four chapters on
Mexico
dominate the middle end of the book. While this is not my
principal area of interest, it is evident that Mexico holds
an
important position as evidence of the success of policy when
responding to research! Sylvia Schmelkes details the gap
between improving statistics and a continuing growing
inequity.
The Mexico cases examine its diverse population, as well as
the
issues of policy and equity for the poor. These include the
study of actual attainments to create a baseline [research],
the
evidence regarding the rural poor, the indigenous v. the
“white” population, and an evaluation of the
five-year plan in its poorest state. Some evidence
describes the
incomes, status, and opportunity available to varied
households
across the population. Other evidence documents the
inequality
and marginalization of groups. Yet, policy results do
indicate a
continuing hopefulness!
Peru is used to
study
the role of educational finance in fostering educational
inequality. The evidence is damning. Yet here again the
examples of success within the very limits of government
expenditure continue a thread of hope in this study.
Throughout
the book, the threads weaving the texture of the story
details
pervasive problems of children denied opportunity due to
insufficient finance, poor facilities, poverty in the home,
and
lack of materials. Intertwined with these facts are stories
of
success and hope.
One of the
fascinating
elements of this book is the inclusion of the United
States. A
full chapter, by Gary Orfield, discusses those parts of the
US
where continuing, even institutionalized poverty mirrors the
impact of third world poverty and its equity void. He
questions
the use of the United States as a world model when so much
inequality remains embedded in the system. Orfield offers
quantitative evidence the mid-twentieth century of the
persistence of inequality and the failure to alleviate those
conditions in an economy without real excuses for its
failure.
Matching the theme of the book, Orfield underlines the
failure to
produce equity in the social, economic, and political
context in
which unequal schools exist: where test scores represent
social
and economic advantage not education, and where the market
offers
no protection for those without knowledge.
Unequal Schools,
Unequal Opportunities fulfills its
goals. It provides the evidence to define its context. It
also
examines and describes successful policy. What is most
clear is
that the problems have always overwhelmed the effort to
resolve
them, and in all cases it has been the poor who have
suffered the
consequences. Equity has deprived the poor, but it has
deprived
the nation of their talents. The bottom line this book
offers is
that the need to solve the problems of poverty coexists with
the
problems of staffing, facilities, and curriculum that may
characterize poor schools. Equity is a social and economic
problem that becomes an educational issue. The schools
exist
within a specific context, and are effected by--often
determined
by--its conditions.
Unequal
Schools offers data and suggestions
for
a wholistic approach to making education a positive tool for
social and economic development. It is not limited to the
developing world, or to Latin America, although that is its
focus. Unequal Schools should be a
classic!
References
McGinn, Noel and
Fernando Reimers (1997). Informed Dialogue: Using
Research
to Shape Policy
Around
the World. Westport, Conn.:
Praeger.
Reimers, Fernando
(ed.)
(1995). La Educacion en El Salvador de Cara Al Siglo
XXI. San Salvador, El
Salvador: UCA Editores.
About the Reviewer
James J.
Harrington
Boston
College
Graduate School of
Education
Chestnut Hill,
MA
The reviewer is a
teacher of history and doctoral candidate in the Higher
Education
Program at Boston College. As an independent scholar his
research interests include Latin American history,
particularly
Central America; the history of education and particularly
international education; and, higher education.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment