Saturday, March 1, 2025

Coles, Martin J. and Southworth, Geoff. (Eds.) (2005). Developing Leadership: Creating the Schools of Tomorrow. Reviewed by Jorge Aguilar, Arizona State University

Education Review-a journal of book reviews

Coles, Martin J. and Southworth, Geoff. (Eds.) (2005). Developing Leadership: Creating the Schools of Tomorrow. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Pp. xxi + 180
$35.15     ISBN 0335215424

Reviewed by Jorge Aguilar
Arizona State University

December 27, 2005

At a time when social complexity seems to increase and educational challenges become more demanding, ways of improving schooling seem to be distant. Education policies come and go, and a variety of strategies implemented to bring about change have failed. In this context, noted educational scholar Michael Fullan, (2001, 2003, 2005) has put forward “leadership” as a key element that can affect both educational change and student learning and achievement. The term, however, has been used so ubiquitously that its meaning has become vague and imprecise. A range of definitions and interpretations can be found in the literature. Consensus on its meaning is still lacking.

Developing Leadership: Creating the Schools of Tomorrow is just about that: reaching a consensus by touching on a number of key issues in the development of the skills school leaders will need to run the schools of tomorrow. It is also about “opening up debate and describing possibilities.” (p. xii) Edited by Martin Coles and Geoff Southworth, heads of the research department of National College of School Leadership, the book also examines leadership development programs and strategies in different regions of the world.

The book, which is part of the Professional Learning Series of the Open University Press, is the outcome of Learning from best practice worldwide, an international conference that brought together researchers and experts on leadership from the U.S., Britain, Europe, Canada, Australia, and Asia. The conference was organized by the National College of School Leadership that was established by the British Government in 2002, and whose raison d'être is “to ensure that school leaders are supported, developed and have access to research and leading-edge thinking on leadership from across the world” (p. xiii).

Ivor Goodman and Andy Hargreaves, editors of the Professional Learning Series, describe in the preface the general picture of the current situation of education in Britain, the U.S., and Canada as a point of departure for the book. They critique how schools have been invaded by standardization and how “years of obsession with the management of standards and targets in tested achievement are giving way to a new era of leadership that will create learning for all in a creative and complex knowledge society.” (p. xiii)

They assert that teaching is in a predicament and that “it is the core profession, the key change agent in today’s knowledge society.” (p. xi) They suggest that educational efforts should focus on student learning and achievement, which means there should also be a commitment to improving teachers’ and school leaders’ professional learning, knowledge and development. As Hargreaves and Goodson put it, “leaving no child behind means leaving no teacher or leader behind either.” (p. xi)

Key leadership issues

Developing leaders for the future. In the first chapter, Dean Fisk, proposes an answer to the question, how should leaders be prepared for their future as leaders of learning? He critiques the fixation of educational agencies and policy makers on practices that maintain a focus on lists of proficiencies and a rigid profile in the training and development of school leaders. In reaction to this fixation, he advocates an approach through which future leaders could be identified, recruited and selected based on their potential to become ongoing learners of leadership. Fisk makes the case for explicit attention to such human qualities as ethics, common sense, imagination, intuition and memory. He explains that these qualities would help leaders to develop the skills and tools they will need as future school leaders of learning.

The preparation of future leaders, according to Fisk, should be based on a holistic rather than a reductionist view. Training programs based on a holistic focus should make leaders aware of understanding learning, making connections, futures thinking, contextual knowledge, critical thinking, political acumen andemotional understanding. He sees these “learnings” as essential for leaders to understand and face future challenges. Another important issue he highlights is the immersion of future leaders into ”communities of practice” (Wenger, 1998) and their ability to become active members of such communities.

Leadership succession and sustainability. Putting together the qualities, learnings, and involvement in communities of practice noted by Fisk requires thoughtful consideration of leadership succession. Hargreaves, in Chapter 2, urges educational authorities to plan carefully and control the frequency of succession (rotation and replacement) of school leaders. Efforts to achieve sustainability, a vital issue in educational leadership and change, are dependent on leaders staying in schools at least five years provided goals are being achieved. In addition, leadership should be favored over management, because management produces order and stability whereas leadership yields change and progress that can lead to student achievement.

Distributed leadership. Limiting the frequency of leadership succession and lengthening the stay of leaders in school is not enough. Leadership practice is identified and shaped by the interaction of leaders, followers and the context they find themselves in. That is, leadership is distributed, stretched over the leaders, co-leaders and their situations (Cf. Spillane et al. in Chapter 4). In distributed leadership, collaboration and interdependencies are recognized and encouraged. The leader is conceptualized not as the know-it-all but as a person who identifies and makes the most of the potential of school co-leaders; namely, he or she empowers them to accomplish their common goal: improving student learning.

A special emphasis is placed on leadership practice as a critical element of distributed leadership, which is achieved through the interrelation of leaders, followers and tools. Leaders not only work with co-leaders but also make use of tools to make leadership practice possible. It is a tripartite structure that assists schools in accomplishing their goals. Examples of tools they discuss are materials artifacts, observation protocols, and tests.

Leadership development in situ. Context-sensitive leadership development is a crucial element that underlines most of the chapters. For example, Stott and Kong in Chapter 7 contend that effective learning and ongoing development take place in the contexts where school leaders work and that attempts to separate them from their work cultures should not be allowed. It is also argued that when it comes to designing the preparation and development of school leaders, their opinions and experience should be taken into account. School leadership should be context-based and activities that raise awareness of the elements that make up school leaders’ environments should be favored over generalizations. Generalizations tend to overlook key contextual influences that can make a difference in understanding their situations better and in decision making processes.

Moreover, some of the chapters suggest that leaders cannot be separated from their settings, from their co-leaders and from where student learning comes into action, where all human and organizational elements mingle to bring about students’ learning. Leaders’ development and leadership ability are too important to divorce them from their educational milieus. In the case of preparation of aspiring school leaders, efforts should be made to bring them close to practical situations and to make them work with mentors and to spend time as interns.

Professional learning communities. In various chapters, the contributors reiterate the importance of making schools learning communities because they can build their capacity to deal with change and to face the external forces that shape schools. Leading robust learning communities, however, requires the establishment of good relations and trust among the members of the learning community. It also calls for a set of conditions including the creation of a culture of learning, the ongoing development of leaders themselves, teachers and support staff, and attention to their affective side. Other conditions are evidence-based decision making, pooling everybody’s capabilities to face challenges and solve problems collectively, and interconnecting the programs, projects and schemes that schools operate to bring about change.

Developing Leadership: Creating the Schools of Tomorrow undoubtedly reaches the consensus it sought and makes it clear that to provide the foundations for leadership development and the creation of the schools of tomorrow, a number of developmental and constructivist practices and theories should be considered. For example, it is evident throughout the book that to become a good school leader, the preparation and development of aspiring or existing leaders ought to be context-specific, process-based, and group- and goal-oriented. It is also apparent that developing leadership is about identifying and distributing leadership, achieving sustainability, influencing rather than coercing change, creating learning communities, planning succession, thinking strategically about Information and Communication Technology, and being an ongoing learner of leadership. But above all, it is clear that leadership development should be valued and perceived as having one paramount goal: paving the way for successful student learning and achievement in a just environment.

A strength of Developing leadership is that in the description and evaluation of the leadership development programs and projects in the book, the contributors introduce concepts and ideas that are clarified and supported by research findings, professional experience, vignettes, and up-to-date literature. They also make use of an engaging narrative that is coherent and accessible to anyone interested in becoming familiar with the principles and practice of leadership development for the first time, or those interested in furthering their understanding and knowing more about leadership practices and innovations in other parts of the world. Any educationist will find Developing Leadership thought provoking and an opportunity to reflect on his or her professional and academic goals and practices.

On a more critical note, it should be also noted that contributors to this book tacitly offer suggestions for the creation of the schools of tomorrow and for the preparation of the school leaders for the future. A more explicit and extensive discussion would have been welcome. In the discussion of such important issues, implied suggestions should be brought more into the open. Let us not disguise them in the subtlety of the printed word.

Developing Leadership provides a lot of introspection and insight for education stakeholders, and more specifically for policy makers and education authorities at many levels. Developing Leadership could be used as a springboard for thinking aloud within schools, teacher education programs and colleges of education to find ways to imagine and then put into practice innovative techniques for developing the school leaders of tomorrow. But as the book often reminds us, educational leadership should not be seen as an end in itself but as a means to achieve the key goal of improving student learning and achievement.

References

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. (2003). The Moral Imperative of School Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and Sustainability. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

About the Reviewer

Jorge Aguilar is a PhD student in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the College of Education of Arizona State University. His areas of interest include teacher education and learning, teacher belief systems, classroom dynamics and curriculum theory and development.

Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the Education Review.

No comments:

Post a Comment