Gersmehl, Phil. (2008) Teaching Geography (2nd
Edition) New York: Guilford
Pp. vi + 320 ISBN 978-1-59385-715-8
Reviewed by Andrew Milson May 15, 2009
In Teaching Geography, Phil Gersmehl offers multiple
analogies as a way of thinking about geography education. The
first analogy is that of the "Geographical Scissors." Gersmehl
dispenses with the long-standing feud between proponents of the
regional approach to geography and those who favor a
topical/systematic orientation to the subject by explaining that
both are necessary and should work in cooperation—like the
two blades of a scissors. The second key analogy articulated by
Gersmehl is that of a rope with three strands as a model of
geographic knowledge. The three strands of images/facts,
analyses/theories, and evaluations/issues are presented as a rope
to conjure the notion that no one strand should be privileged
over the others (as in a hierarchical model) and that the
strength of the endeavor rests on all three working in tight
cooperation. These three strands also work similar to the
components of language—letters/words, sentences/paragraphs,
and metaphors/semantic overtones—to form a comprehensible
"language of geography". The third major analogy is to the cornerstones of a building's
foundation. Gersmehl explains that the foundation of
geographical inquiry has the four cornerstones of location,
condition, connection, and region. Location is important
because "you have to know where something is before you can study
it geographically" (p. 59). Condition is Gersmehl's preferred
term for the concept of place or site; "the features, processes,
and human actions that make the location meaningful" (p. 65).
Connection concerns the "analysis of the ways in which locations
are connected to each other" (p. 74). Gersmehl describes the
concept of region as a geographical form of classification that
aids in geographical comparison. He likens the geographer's use
of region as a disciplinary concept to the historian's use of
epoch or era. The four cornerstones are Gersmehl's version of the "Five
Themes of Geography" (Location, Place, Human-Environment
Interaction, Movement, and Region) that achieved enormous
popularity in the field in the mid-1990s. In a chapter about
themes in geographic education, Gersmehl asserts that the
attention given the five themes has been misguided and has led to
the promotion of materials and strategies that "actually subvert
the idea of theme-oriented pedagogy" (p. 87). In another
analogy—this time to music—Gersmehl explains that a
theme should hold a lesson (or musical composition) together in a
way that emphasizes important ideas (or musical phrases) and that
lends coherence to the experience for the student (or
listener). He suggests that this is best accomplished when
themes are used inductively and cooperatively. In other words,
the theme need not be announced at the beginning of a lesson (or
at all) but should be discovered by students in an "aha" moment.
Furthermore, the themes should not be taught in isolation, but
cooperatively. The danger of "themeless" pedagogy in geography
teaching is the tendency toward overgeneralization and/or
trivia-listing. A fourth analogy is to a multi-wheeled cart as representative
of the support structure needed for geography teachers. Gersmehl
suggests that improving geography teaching at the K-12 level
involves the improvement of pre-service teacher training,
in-service teacher training, the curricular position of
geography, and geography teaching materials. Each of these
areas is represented as a wheel on a four wheeled cart. The cart
analogy implies that no one area is more important than another
and that experts in each area must focus attention on their
respective "wheel" rather than trying to do everything at once.
Furthermore, reform in geography education will not proceed as
long as those who resist change point to the relative "flatness"
of one or more of the "wheels" as an excuse for
inaction. In one chapter that is a departure from the analogy structure,
Gersmehl presents eight modes of spatial thinking that are based
on his review of the research literature in neuroscience,
developmental psychology, and other disciplines. These eight
modes (Comparison, Aura, Region, Transition, Hierarchy, Analogy,
Pattern, and Association) are described as "neurologically
distinct" because "neuroscientists have identified some separate
brain structures or links that appear to be dedicated to that
specific kind of thinking" (p. 104). Gersmehl asserts that all
of these modes should be taught at each grade level and provides
suggestions for introducing and developing each of these modes of
spatial thinking across the K-12 experience. In addition to the text, the book is packaged with a companion
CD that includes teaching resources such as sample units,
PowerPoint files, handouts, animations, discussion guides,
transparency masters, a bibliography, and so forth. There are
references through the book to relevant CD units and materials.
Teaching Geographyis much more than a "how-to" book
about geography teaching. Although there are numerous "how-to"
suggestions, Gersmehl offers these suggestions within the context
of a theory and philosophy of geographic education. The reader
is invited to think about geography teaching as much as she is
told how to do it. There is a Deweyan motif in Gersmehl's
rejection of dualistic thinking and his support of pragmatic
approaches to pedagogy. Similarly, his advocacy for inductive
teaching of key concepts, spiraled-holistic approaches to
curriculum sequencing, and cognitive psychology as a guide to
curriculum design evoke Brunerian thought. While Germehl makes use of long-standing progressive and
constructivist notions of good teaching, he successfully applies
these ideas to geography teaching and articulates his theories in
ways that are both readable and memorable. Although analogical
reasoning can be hazardous, Gersmehl manages to provide analogies
that succeed in capturing important ideas without the
condescending reductionism that frequently plagues writing
intended for teacher audiences. Gersmehl avoids talking down to
teachers while maintaining a writing style that is conversational
and frequently humorous. There are amusing terms such as
"categorilla" and "ok-but-itis" used to illustrate, respectively,
the dangers of teaching exceptional features in geography
(longest, tallest, deepest, highest) and the "disease" that leads
to "textbook obesity"; namely, the tendency of reviewers to say
"this book is OK but it doesn't say anything about topic X and it
would be better if they added just a little bit about that" (p.
148). At the risk of contracting in OK-but-itis, I believe the work
would be improved immensely with the inclusion of references to
both kindred and antagonist authors. The text of the book is
devoid of citations with the exception of reference to source
articles for tables and post-scripts at the end of some
chapters. The reference list at the end of the book is slightly
less than three pages in length, yet there are no in-text
citations for most of these sources. Although I trust that
Gersmehl has actually read and appropriately synthesized "nearly
1200 recent research studies" (p. 99) on modes of spatial
thinking, the reader must take Gersmehl's word for it and is not
provided with even a short list of sources should he or she wish
to pursue the topic in greater depth. There are 124 pages at
the back of the book that are devoted to transparency masters
that are also available on the companion CD. A better use for
those printed pages would have been to provide the reader with a
list of suggested readings at the end of each chapter, as well as
a more thorough reference list that is more dutifully cited in
the text. Overall, Teaching Geography is an excellent resource
for teachers, professional development facilitators, curriculum
coordinators, and others concerned with geography education.
Gersmehl subtly weaves theoretical and philosophical
considerations together with memorable analogies, substantive
anecdotes, amusing asides, and an occasional soapbox appeal. I
advise the reader to check his or her expectations about
geography teaching at the front cover. Thus, one may find
oneself rethinking cherished notions while reaffirming others.
An author such as Gersmehl who accomplishes both of these tasks
between the covers of a book has provided an important
contribution to the field. About the Reviewer Andrew Milson is an Associate Professor in the College of
Education at the University of North Texas. His research focuses
on geography education with a particular emphasis on geospatial
technologies in educational environments. He studies how
emerging technologies such as Geographic Information Systems
(GIS), the Global Positioning System (GPS), Remote Sensing (RS),
and Web-based mapping can be harnessed to help students and
teachers as they engage in geography education at all levels and
in a variety of contexts. He is the co-editor with Marsha
Alibrandi of the recent book, Digital Geography: Geospatial
Technologies in the Social Studies Classroom (Information Age
Publishing, Inc., 2008). |
Friday, August 1, 2025
Gersmehl, Phil. (2008) Teaching Geography (2nd Edition) Reviewed by Andrew Milson<, University of North Texas
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dowdy-Kilgour, J. (2008). <cite>PhD Stories: Conversations with My Sisters</cite>. Reviewed by Ezella McPherson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Dowdy-Kilgour, J. (2008). PhD Stories : Conversations with My Sisters . Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. Pp. ...
-
Ravitch, Diane. (1996) National Standards in American Education: A Citizen's Guide. Washington: The Brooki...
-
Chomsky, Noam. (2000). Chomsky on MisEducation , (Edited and introduced by Donaldo Macedo). New York: Rowan and...
-
Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas Howe, Kenneth R. (1997) Understanding Equal Educationa...
No comments:
Post a Comment